David Maister - Professional Business, Professional Life

jump to menu jump to content
David Maister - Professional Business, Professional Life
David's ResourcesAbout David
NEW! Browse my materials by topic of interest:StrategyManagingClient RelationsCareersGeneral

Passion, People and Principles

post # 433 — Monday, September 17, 2007 — a Managing post

Outcomes and Behaviors

I have just listened to an interesting interview with David Morgan, CEO of Westpac - Australia's oldest bank and oldest company.  (I'm here in Sydney as part of a convention organized by the Australian Institute of Management. )

Among the interesting things he had to say was a description of how Westpac enforces its values. For each person, from the CEO on down to the lowest front-line person, each individual is evaluated according to two dimensions - what they accomplished (their outcomes) and HOW they accomplished them (their behaviors.) The behaviors evaluated include "doing the right thing", integrity, apolitical behavior, thinking of the best interests of the bank rather than just the individual's own operating unit, etc. According to David Morgan, the system which feeds directly into a person's remuneration, is a key mechanism for ensuring that the values are lived.

I've heard that GE also has a similar system.

Has anyone out there experienced such sytems (ie lived within an organization which uses this approach)? How effective is it in ensuring compliance wit organizational values?


Order your copy of David Maister’s new book, Strategy and the Fat Smoker today!

print this post | add to del.icio.us
trackback url: http://davidmaister.com/trackback.php?id=483

5 Comments

Krishna De said

http://www.bizgrowthnews.com

David - yes I was SVP HR for a business who integrated this approach for ALL our employees. It was part of our OD strategy so that each person could connect their personal role to the strategy of the business.

We implemented a very transparent performance management system as part of an overall culture change programme - all employees understood where they were in relation to performance and potential ratings as part of our management development review. The what and how of performance management were also a critical element.

In fact that is what I would advocate for all performance management programmes. Delivering on the WHAT but mortgaging future sales and relationships inside and outside the business because of not delivering against the HOW can be a short term way to drive performance but does not build long term value and sustainability.

posted on Monday, September 17, 2007

Stuart Cross said

www.morgancross.co.uk

David - I worked with this performance appraisal approach in my last corporate role. Like any other appraisal/review process it is as good as the objectives that are set. Understanding clearly what behaviours are required and what will not be tolerated is critical to the system's credibility.

In my case, the approach worked OK-ish but would have been improved by a more clearly articulated and consistent set of measurement criteria.

posted on Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Michael Haberman. SPHR said

www.omegahrsolutions.blogspot.com

This sounds alot like the old MBO/BARS approach. I tried to introduce that once and the feedback I got was that it took long enough to determine objectives. No one was willing to then spend the time to then describe the behaviors that were also necessary and appropriate. I think you may find that you get the same reaction today.

posted on Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Rob Withecombe said

In relation to Michael Haberman's comment whereby he found that "no one was willing to spend the time to the describe the behaviors that were also necessary and appropriate", are we not in an era whereby we (professional services organisations) can typically describe the values that we seek to exhibit and at the same time, invest time and money in full 360 feedback? Is not 360 at least part of the answer as to how you measure bahaviours as against values?

Certainly my firm has established values and increasingly embraced 360, albeit without perhaps taking the extra step of utilising it to allow measurement of the value based behaviours. On reflection, the additional step may be worth making.

posted on Tuesday, September 18, 2007

Wally Bock said

http://blog.threestarleadership.com

Another company that does something similar is Koch Industries.

posted on Wednesday, September 19, 2007


Post a Comment

Note: This blog uses a 2-click comment system to combat spam. After you submit your comment below, you will be prompted to click a second button to complete the posting process.








0 Trackbacks

trackback url: http://davidmaister.com/trackback.php?id=483

 Blog RSS

(about RSS)

sign up here to receive blog posts by email


Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

(about Technorati)

Blog Archive

As my blog has grown extensively over the past year, I've created a new dynamic blog archive for those of you who may be looking to dig through the earlier discussions.

Due to the ever-expanding nature of the conversation here, I’ve created this indexing system to help those of you that may be looking for earlier conversations. Click on any of the four main topics below to see their subcategories, and click the subcategories to see the relevant blog posts. Click here or on the x in the top corner at any point to return to the main blog page.

This is a beta version of the interface, and we plan to develop a more refined catgorization scheme but thought this early version would be useful.

Recent Comments
Recent Posts
Popular Posts