David Maister - Professional Business, Professional Life

jump to menu jump to content
David Maister - Professional Business, Professional Life
David's ResourcesAbout David
NEW! Browse my materials by topic of interest:StrategyManagingClient RelationsCareersGeneral

Passion, People and Principles

post # 387 — Wednesday, June 13, 2007 — a Managing post

The 2R Manager

In preparation for a seminar I was doing, I reviewed a wonderful book called “The 2R Manager,” (Jossey Bass, 2002) for which I wrote the foreword, and which I recommend a lot.

It was written by Peter Friedes, the former CEO of Hewitt Associates, the HR consulting firm.

Pete’s basic insight is that, to be effective in managing others, we must know both how to be “requiring” of people (that’s the first R) – make sure that they deliver on and live up to the tasks they take on. A manager must also, however, do this in a way that “Relates” (the second R) to each individual.

These two dimensions can define nine kinds of managers:

The first four are the extremes:

The Abdicator: low requiring, low relating

The Demander: high requiring, low relating

The Pleaser: low requiring, high relating

The Overwhelmer: high requiring, high relating

Then there are four which are less problematical, but still less than perfect:

The Supervisor: About right requiring, but low relating

The Friend: About right relating, but low requiring

The Encroacher: About right requiring, but high relating

The Energizer: About right relating, but high requiring

 

The best, in Pete’s view, is someone who is about right in both requiring and relating: The 2R Manager.

Which are you? Which is your boss?


Order your copy of David Maister’s new book, Strategy and the Fat Smoker today!

print this post | add to del.icio.us
trackback url: http://davidmaister.com/trackback.php?id=426

4 Comments

Diana Hird said

www.hirdassociates.com

As an exercise in applying the 2R categories, how would you all categorize the boss in the sitcom The Office?  I haven't read the 2R book (though I'm utterly intrigued) but I'm thinking he's low on requiring.  As for relating?  Wouldn't that depend on whether we're looking at quantity or quality of relating?  He definitely tries to be the pleaser but I can't say he's pleasing anyone other than himself.

posted on Wednesday, June 13, 2007

David (Maister) said

Pete Friedes asked me to post this response to Diana's question:

Michael in The Office is definitely a "Pleaser" and like most pleasers doesn't please anyone. He is a severe Over-Relater and non-existent Requirer.

posted on Thursday, June 14, 2007

Mi said

http://www.trustedlog.com/

Very interesting division. Sure that the book is needed to be researched closely.

posted on Thursday, June 14, 2007

chris said

re: Micheal Scott (The Office)

Though Michael Scott is ficticious, I think he demostrates the point that this 3x3 grid needs a fourth row and column -- managers that are over-the-top in either relating or requiring.

Or is it the case that if you are over the top in either you are automatically deficient in the other -- if you're over-Requiring you're almost certainly non-Relating?

No it can't be that extreme; I've known some people that are over-Relating and still adequately Requiring...

posted on Monday, June 18, 2007

0 Trackbacks

trackback url: http://davidmaister.com/trackback.php?id=426

 Blog RSS

(about RSS)

sign up here to receive blog posts by email


Add this blog to my Technorati Favorites!

(about Technorati)

Blog Archive

As my blog has grown extensively over the past year, I've created a new dynamic blog archive for those of you who may be looking to dig through the earlier discussions.

Due to the ever-expanding nature of the conversation here, I’ve created this indexing system to help those of you that may be looking for earlier conversations. Click on any of the four main topics below to see their subcategories, and click the subcategories to see the relevant blog posts. Click here or on the x in the top corner at any point to return to the main blog page.

This is a beta version of the interface, and we plan to develop a more refined catgorization scheme but thought this early version would be useful.

Recent Comments
Recent Posts
Popular Posts