Rights and Obligations
post # 262 — December 15, 2006 — a Managing, Strategy post
I have long held a theory that organizations ought to have (enforced) “rights and obligations†that each of their members (ie employees at any level) must follow. Here’s a first attempt to draft a sensible “rights and obligations†list for a professional business.
Members of the organization have an obligation to:
Act with integrity and high ethical standards at all times
Serve client first, firm second, themselves last
Continuous self-improvement (no cruising)
Preserve reputation of the firm
Reach out for additional responsibility
Take the initiative
Help others (that report to them) succeed
Be a team player
Work hard
Treat all people as valuable members of the “team”.
Treat all professionals with trust and respect.
Cooperate with everyone within and between departments.
Delegate work to the appropriate level.
Members have rights to:
Stretching assignments
Be kept informed of what’s going on in the organization
Be treated with respect
Know the criteria by which they will be assessed
A good understanding of the overall goals and objectives of our firm.
Freedom to make the necessary decisions to do their work properly.
Be kept informed about the things THEY need to know to do their job properly.
Input on issues that affect their work.
The resources necessary to provide high quality client service.
Understand how their compensation is determined.
Work that makes good use of their knowledge and ability.
Work that has variety, interest and challenge
Encouragement and opportunity to learn new skills
A clear understanding of their responsibilities.
Useful performance feedback throughout the year.
High quality of on-the-job training.
**
What would YOU add or delete for an ideal professional business?
Phil Gott said:
I agree entirely that organizations can benefit by having “rights and obligations†that each of their members must follow, although I think it essential that members have an input in deciding what those rights and obligations should be. No standard list will do. Coming up with a list that suits their organisation and that members would be willing to sign up to is one of the best team-building activities a team can undertake. < ?xml:namespace prefix =" o" ns =" "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"" />
Incidentally David, you refer to “(enforced) rights and obligationsâ€. I assume that by placing “enforced†in brackets you are not suggesting that enforcement is optional but instead that enforcement is essential. Without a willingness to enforce such rights and obligations there would be little point having them.
Involving a team in creating a list of rights and obligations (I have known teams refer to them as their “Team Deal†or Team Charterâ€) gives a team leader an invaluable tool in bringing team members into line. Now the team leader has the full written support of the team behind their enforcement efforts. Very useful.
posted on December 15, 2006